{"id":8433,"date":"2019-01-23T08:23:00","date_gmt":"2019-01-23T08:23:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bimedia.org\/blogs\/?guid=5e06f5badafc6ddedbcb67488e83f55b"},"modified":"2019-01-24T21:12:45","modified_gmt":"2019-01-24T21:12:45","slug":"a-fine-debate-in-the-lords","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bimedia.org\/blogs\/2019\/01\/a-fine-debate-in-the-lords\/","title":{"rendered":"A fine debate in the Lords"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bicommunitynews.co.uk\/8394\/lords-debate-civil-partnership-reform\/\" >Bi Community News reports on the second reading of the Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths Bill<\/a> in the House of Lords last week.<\/p>\n<p>There were some excellent contributions all round, though Lib Dem peer Baroness Barker gave for my money the best contribution to the debate, with lots of depth in the subjects at hand as well as warm understanding of the rest of humanity. Also it reminded me of chatting over breakfast with the Baroness and comparing notes on our recent engagements:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cMy Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Hodgson of  Abinger, for the way in which she introduced this Bill, which deals with  matters of enormous importance and sensitivity to a very small number  of people. I am delighted to speak today not least because my father  married a lot of people. He was a nonconformist&nbsp;minister, and I must  tell your Lordships that the day on which the Church of England took a  more enlightened view towards the remarriage of divorced people was a  cause of great sadness in our household.<br \/>\u201cTurning to&nbsp;Clause&nbsp;1, in 2016, I was absolutely delighted to get  married in a beautiful chapel\u2014it was medieval and deconsecrated, I have  to say\u2014but it was none the less a wonderful day. During the  preparations, my wife and I had to see the registrar, and we all  concluded that the fact that we had to tell the registrar who our  fathers were but not our mothers was simply and utterly anachronistic.<br \/>\u201cI am also indebted to my dad for reasons why we should accept the  Bill today. Many years ago, my father was officiating at a wedding  in&nbsp;Glasgow University Chapel. In fact, it was the wedding of some family  friends. When he took the couple out to sign the register, they turned  to the groom\u2019s mother, who was in fact a professional registrar\u2014and she  had forgotten the certificate. So my father and mother had to disappear  from the reception to go and get it so they could be married. Until  today, few people knew that the pictures of the happy couple are in fact  of them signing a bit of blotting paper for the purpose. So it is high  time that we leap forward with tech and make the changes to the  schedules outlined in Clause 1.<br \/>\u201cTurning to Clause 2 and civil partnerships, there has been a huge  debate about why, given that gay people are now allowed to be married  and we have civil marriage, we need equal civil partnership. I have  spent a lot of time thinking about this, not least because my dad often  married people in church and had to think carefully about whether that  was the most appropriate thing to do. He had the right to refuse to  marry people\u2014it was a right that he exercised sparingly, but he did  think about it. Back in those days, he thought that there were times  when it was not appropriate for people have their ceremonies in church.<br \/>\u201cOn the question of civil partnership, I am greatly indebted to  friends of mine. I am thinking in particular of one person who at a very  young age was party to a violent and traumatic marriage. She managed to  escape from that and subsequently spent more than 30 years with another  man whom she loved deeply, but the idea of entering into something  called marriage was absolutely not right. That is no reflection on the  value of their relationship, and for her, a civil partnership would have  been highly appropriate. I am indebted to her for getting in touch with  me last night. When I told her that we were going to be discussing  this, she said, \u201cLook, there is a point in this. People who talk about  marriage frequently talk about it being a union of two people. I do not  disagree with that at all, but for me, the fact we are talking about a  civil partnership\u2014a partnership of two people who are interdependent  rather than dependent on each other\u2014is extremely important\u201d. She, other  friends of mine and others who are a part of the campaign for equal  civil partnership have often talked about that point.<br \/>\u201cI too want to talk about this in the context of the role of  religions. I have spent a lifetime observing and wandering around the  religious sensibilities of other people. Through all the arguments we  had about civil partnership and same-sex marriage, time and again  opponents were quick to throw at us the accusation that somehow this was  undermining marriage as it is understood by the religious bodies in  this country.<br \/>\u201cNo one ever recognised the fact that sometimes, a person falls in  love with someone who is not of the faith into which they were born, and  part of the process of managing their relationship with their family is  that they do not get married. Until now, if those people are  heterosexual, there has been no way to enter into a legal commitment  with their partner while at the same time juggling sensitivities with  their family. This is therefore an important step forward.<br \/>\u201cLater, we will hear from the noble Lord,&nbsp;Lord Lexden, why we should  extend civil partnerships to people who are from the same family,  because of the issue of tenancies and property. It is not news to him  that I oppose that. I believe it is wholly wrong to take a body of  legislation designed to apply to adults who, of their own volition, come  together to form a family unit and apply it to relationships which are  consanguineous and cannot be broken. I agree with him that there is an  anomaly in our fiscal law that needs to be sorted, but our fiscal law  already makes allowances for children. Those who have children\u2019s best  interests at heart should go down that route and desist from this  campaign, founded and funded by evangelical Christians, to have a go at  civil partnerships and same-sex marriage. We are talking about two  completely different things.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;As a novel-thumping atheist it&#8217;s easy for me to forget about the complexities of life that having gods can bring, and I particularly welcomed being reminded about intermarriage between people who were raised in or came to the worship of different gods than their partner. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bi Community News reports on the second reading of the Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths Bill in the House of Lords last week.There were some excellent contributions all round, though Lib Dem peer Baroness Barker gave for my money the best contr&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1211,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,777,56,213],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8433","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bi","category-civil-partnerships","category-ldb","category-marriage"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bimedia.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8433","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bimedia.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bimedia.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bimedia.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bimedia.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8433"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/bimedia.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8433\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9133,"href":"https:\/\/bimedia.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8433\/revisions\/9133"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bimedia.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1211"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bimedia.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8433"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bimedia.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8433"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bimedia.org\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8433"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}