Biphobia
Biphobia
By Jacqueline Applebee
(Previously printed in Bisexual Community News. Free to repost with author credit)
Some people face biphobia at work; some at their local church, mosque or pub. The irrational fear and hatred of bisexuality is not a concept for me. Biphobia is real. It stands about seven feet tall with a red, blotchy face. Biphobia wears a shabby black cloak. He has an evil stare. Biphobia makes me feel very uncomfortable sometimes.
I wake up one day to find Biphobia sitting at the bottom of my bed, smoking a cigarette. “You managed to sleep with a woman yet?” he points to the mound beneath the covers.
My boyfriend groans, turns over and blinks at me. “Morning, love.”
Biphobia stubs the cigarette out inches from my leg. “Nobody will take you seriously if you only sleep with men,” Biphobia growls. “Find yourself a hot lesbian, and she’ll sort you out. Your neighbour, Paula will do.”
As if on cue, I hear a knock at the front door. I jump out of bed, pulling a long t-shirt over my head. Sure enough, Paula is outside holding a kitten in her arms.
“How sweet,” Biphobia drawls. “A lesbian with a cat—two for the price of one.”
“Can you keep Moxie for the morning?” Paula asks breathlessly. “My mum is coming around.”
“Is she allergic to cats?” I ask.
“Moxie’s allergic to her. Some people are just too straight, you know?”
I take the mewling cat. “No problem, Paula. I’m not due in until this afternoon. It will be fun to play with the little thing.”
Paula straightens her blouse, fingers the top button. “I was wondering, if you’ve got nothing else on, why not come over for lunch?” Paula smiles at me. “I’ve been thinking of you a lot, you know?”
At that moment, my boyfriend comes down the stairs wearing nothing but a towel draped around his hips.
Paula goes pale. “Oh, I see you’re busy.” She literally grabs the kitten from me.
“I can still look after Moxie,” I say to her retreating back.
“I don’t want her exposed to hetero-normative influences. She’s a sensitive creature, you know?”
Biphobia shuts the door. He glares at me for some time.
***
The bank I work for starts an LGBT networking group. I don’t quite believe it is real until I enter a room full of happy faces. Queer staff and their partners from all over the South-East have travelled to our Brighton head office to take part in the launch. Of course, Biphobia turns up to the event too. He sloshes down bottles of wine, and eats all the sausage rolls.
A senior cashier from Littlehampton corners me by the windows. “Did you bring your girlfriend with you?” she asks.
“I have a boyfriend,” I respond before I can stop myself. “He was busy.”
The cashier looks like I’ve slapped her. “This group is vitally important for gays and lesbians. It’s not for straights.”
“I’m bisexual.” I’m aware my voice is a whisper. I’m aware I don’t want anyone else to hear me. Biphobia slips an arm around my shoulder. I feel totally intimidated.
The cashier looks embarrassed. She says nothing as she turns and quickly walks away.
Arnold Rosbottom, the area manager, makes a speech. He is full of earnest words. Gays and lesbians are addressed in every single line. Transgender workers get a special mention toward the end. But he doesn’t say bisexual once.
I feel Biphobia’s arms wrap around my chest. He squeezes me so I can barely breathe. “You can end this right now,” Biphobia says. “Admit you’re really a lesbian. Hell, admit you’re really straight, and you won’t have to put up with any more of this crap.”
I feel absolutely terrified as another woman approaches me, even though she smiles as she speaks. “A group of us girls are going to the Candy Bar later. We can get away from all these horrid gay boys.”
Biphobia’s hand slides up to my throat. “Say yes,” he whispers. “Join them.”
My voice is a squeak when my mouth opens. “I’m bisexual. I don’t hate men.” Biphobia’s grip on my throat slackens as I continue. “I like people, period.”
The woman screws up her face. “You need to make up your mind.”
“Preach, sister!” Biphobia calls out. He stands beside her, but he looks somehow smaller.
“I have made up my mind,” I say with a new strength in my voice. “I’m leaving. I’m going to the Brighton Bothways meet-up instead.”
“What’s that?” she asks with a scowl. “Some fetish club?”
“It’s for social for bisexuals and their allies.”
A man standing nearby turns to me. “A bisexual meet up? Can I come too?” He tugs on another woman’s sleeve. “Betty, we’re not the only ones!”
Betty’s eyes light up. “Thank goodness. I feel invisible in this place.” She loops her arm through mine, leads me to the door.
Arnold Rosbottom catches my eye as we all exit. “Leaving already?”
“There’s nothing here for bisexuals,” I say. “You ought to fix that.”
I spot Biphobia slide up behind Arnold. He is about to put his hands on the manager’s shoulder when Arnold nods at me. “Of course you’re right. I should have made everyone feel welcome.”
Biphobia falls over in a heap, suddenly tiny. “Bloody half-gays!” he shouts. “Switch-hitters! Purple-wearing disease spreaders!”
I pay him no heed as I walk out of the room with my new friends. I leave Biphobia behind. And maybe he’ll pop up again tomorrow, but something has changed in me now. Biphobia doesn’t scare me anymore.

BiCon Same-sex relationships session
From Jen’s Little Book Of Wisdom
skibbley 2013-04-17 12:05:25
skibbley 2013-04-17 11:05:25
‘Men & Women in Marriage’ by the CofE / a bisexual Anglican rants
http://www.churchofengland.org/media/1715479/marriagetextbrochureprint.pdf
And reading it it makes me angry, and sad, and more anger, then a little despair, pushed aside by rage, and levelling out at somewhere between livid and seething.
Theirs is not a faith I recognise. They seem a stubborn child, who has gone via it's own convoluted logic to come to a conclusion, and refuses to listen to actual reason when it's pointed out that they've made a mistake or twenty, by those with more experience and understanding, refuses to see how they're just simply wrong; instead, sticking with their viewpoint on the principle that of course they're right, if they've been right up to now, how can they be wrong?
What are we, CATHOLICS??
Sorry, I don't mean any disrespect to the Catholic church and community, but a fundamental difference between Catholic and Protestant thinking - and however some parishes use incense and Latin, the CofE is still philosophically Protestant - is that Protestants left behind the belief that the Church never got things wrong. Protestantism accepts that the Church is a fallible institution, like anything human, and therefore accepts that the Church is perfectly within it's nature to change it's blinkin' mind.
This document reads like it was written by a medieval arsehole. They have no concept of what humanity actually is! Humanity is an infinite collection of combinations - sexuality is on a sliding scale, gender is on a sliding scale. I mean "persons are not asexual, but are either male or female" is just so outdated, it's embarrassing. Like so often when dealing with the church, this makes us cry out yet again for modernisation - get with the times, our understanding of what the human condition is is not longer the constricted, binary concept of yester-century that you guys seem to be working off. Get out in the fresh air guys, muck around with us grunts and you'll see, a) your categories are way off the mark and b) sometimes it isn't possible to define all the aspects of a person and c) you don't HAVE to define everything. They even state "The Church guards a common traditional understanding of marriage as a human, not only a religious act." Then guard the understanding that humanity is complicated, so marriage is not a set-in-stone, just-one-option thing, why don't you?
I'm going to get religious now. You have been warned.
God made a vastly complex universe. At least you've acknowledged that, Church of England. Yet God is vastly more complex. And a person is made in God's image ie just as complex; we don't understand God, so why would we be able to pin down that which is made in Her image?? The arrogance of thinking that the people of this planet are as easily confined to a 'proper ordering' of two boxes is astonishing.
To glory in God, to love His creation, to see the divine in all things and relish in the splendour of creation so that we can be the best that God made us to be, means to accept that an individual's gender, sex, and sexuality are separate things, to accept that God purposefully made an individual whatever combination of gender, sex, and sexuality they might be - the combination nor the components are not a mistake, something to be fixed, or anything wrong - and to accept that an individual may not be able to figure out who they are and what God means for them to be, and you have no right or authority to decide that they have only two options; accept that they may change their minds, several times, while figuring it out. And accept that this is natural, it is human, to be a minority and different to what is usual is in NO WAY unnatural, or wrong, or something to aspire against.
I am angry at the arrogance. I am angry at the stubbornness. I am angry at the illogical, unreasonable, and downright out-of-touch thinking. I am outraged at the clinging to words from Genesis, literal acceptance of an ignorant and bigoted understanding of humanity written by people with over two thousand years less experience, knowledge and understanding than the people sitting in the pews every Sunday right now. Listen to the people in the pews! Listen to the people visiting the church, to the people on the street, the people next door, people in every corner of humanity.
I agree that marriage is important; in fact, I agree with a lot of this document, but the thing is, anything you say about marriage, including most things about parenthood, is entirely applicable to any marriage, whatever the combination of gender there is between the two parties. Marriage is about complementarity, but two people complement each other, it's not the complementarity of gender that creates the bond of marriage.
And I agree that "marriage is a form of committed Christian discipleship for those who understand their own love as part of God’s love towards the world" - direct from the document, and yet, they cannot see the hypocrisy of not including some people and their love as a form of committed Christian discipleship, when Christian discipleship is grounded in an open arms policy, and the obligation to not exclude anyone. It's sickening.
So ultimately, same-sex marriage is a legitimate, natural, and divine state of two people. So why refuse same-sex weddings? That's all the church has to do. The church isn't involved in marriage - that's between the spouses and God. The church's part is the wedding, a celebration and commitment ceremony, not some vehicle for binary, blinkered meddling. Sure, we'll probably have to continue to change attitudes so that the church can give "pastoral help to those who seek to engage with the challenges of life responsibly" to same-sex married couples too, but that's the next battle. We don't need that yet. For now,
stop being stupid.
‘Men & Women in Marriage’ by the CofE / a bisexual Anglican rants
http://www.churchofengland.org/media/1715479/marriagetextbrochureprint.pdf
And reading it it makes me angry, and sad, and more anger, then a little despair, pushed aside by rage, and levelling out at somewhere between livid and seething.
Theirs is not a faith I recognise. They seem a stubborn child, who has gone via it's own convoluted logic to come to a conclusion, and refuses to listen to actual reason when it's pointed out that they've made a mistake or twenty, by those with more experience and understanding, refuses to see how they're just simply wrong; instead, sticking with their viewpoint on the principle that of course they're right, if they've been right up to now, how can they be wrong?
What are we, CATHOLICS??
Sorry, I don't mean any disrespect to the Catholic church and community, but a fundamental difference between Catholic and Protestant thinking - and however some parishes use incense and Latin, the CofE is still philosophically Protestant - is that Protestants left behind the belief that the Church never got things wrong. Protestantism accepts that the Church is a fallible institution, like anything human, and therefore accepts that the Church is perfectly within it's nature to change it's blinkin' mind.
This document reads like it was written by a medieval arsehole. They have no concept of what humanity actually is! Humanity is an infinite collection of combinations - sexuality is on a sliding scale, gender is on a sliding scale. I mean "persons are not asexual, but are either male or female" is just so outdated, it's embarrassing. Like so often when dealing with the church, this makes us cry out yet again for modernisation - get with the times, our understanding of what the human condition is is not longer the constricted, binary concept of yester-century that you guys seem to be working off. Get out in the fresh air guys, muck around with us grunts and you'll see, a) your categories are way off the mark and b) sometimes it isn't possible to define all the aspects of a person and c) you don't HAVE to define everything. They even state "The Church guards a common traditional understanding of marriage as a human, not only a religious act." Then guard the understanding that humanity is complicated, so marriage is not a set-in-stone, just-one-option thing, why don't you?
I'm going to get religious now. You have been warned.
God made a vastly complex universe. At least you've acknowledged that, Church of England. Yet God is vastly more complex. And a person is made in God's image ie just as complex; we don't understand God, so why would we be able to pin down that which is made in Her image?? The arrogance of thinking that the people of this planet are as easily confined to a 'proper ordering' of two boxes is astonishing.
To glory in God, to love His creation, to see the divine in all things and relish in the splendour of creation so that we can be the best that God made us to be, means to accept that an individual's gender, sex, and sexuality are separate things, to accept that God purposefully made an individual whatever combination of gender, sex, and sexuality they might be - the combination nor the components are not a mistake, something to be fixed, or anything wrong - and to accept that an individual may not be able to figure out who they are and what God means for them to be, and you have no right or authority to decide that they have only two options; accept that they may change their minds, several times, while figuring it out. And accept that this is natural, it is human, to be a minority and different to what is usual is in NO WAY unnatural, or wrong, or something to aspire against.
I am angry at the arrogance. I am angry at the stubbornness. I am angry at the illogical, unreasonable, and downright out-of-touch thinking. I am outraged at the clinging to words from Genesis, literal acceptance of an ignorant and bigoted understanding of humanity written by people with over two thousand years less experience, knowledge and understanding than the people sitting in the pews every Sunday right now. Listen to the people in the pews! Listen to the people visiting the church, to the people on the street, the people next door, people in every corner of humanity.
I agree that marriage is important; in fact, I agree with a lot of this document, but the thing is, anything you say about marriage, including most things about parenthood, is entirely applicable to any marriage, whatever the combination of gender there is between the two parties. Marriage is about complementarity, but two people complement each other, it's not the complementarity of gender that creates the bond of marriage.
And I agree that "marriage is a form of committed Christian discipleship for those who understand their own love as part of God’s love towards the world" - direct from the document, and yet, they cannot see the hypocrisy of not including some people and their love as a form of committed Christian discipleship, when Christian discipleship is grounded in an open arms policy, and the obligation to not exclude anyone. It's sickening.
So ultimately, same-sex marriage is a legitimate, natural, and divine state of two people. So why refuse same-sex weddings? That's all the church has to do. The church isn't involved in marriage - that's between the spouses and God. The church's part is the wedding, a celebration and commitment ceremony, not some vehicle for binary, blinkered meddling. Sure, we'll probably have to continue to change attitudes so that the church can give "pastoral help to those who seek to engage with the challenges of life responsibly" to same-sex married couples too, but that's the next battle. We don't need that yet. For now,
stop being stupid.
Glee article in recent BCN magazine
- After Santana said "Sex is not dating", Brittany agreed, saying "If it were, Santana and I would be dating." This had been meant to be delivered as a joke, but after saying that the two of them exchanged awkward glances.
- During Bad Reputation, she wonders why she’s only fourth in the Glist (a ranking of sexual depravity of the members of New Directions) when "I've made out with, like, everyone in this school. Girls, boys, Mr Kinney the janitor."
- During I Am Unicorn, when talking to Kurt about her running as a candidate for class president, she says she realised she was a unicorn too [with Santana's help!], and followed this with "maybe a bicorn".
- During The Spanish Teacher, she joked that she was "bilingual".
- In Props, after Santana told a teacher in the teachers’ lounge that they were both gay, Brittany pointed out that she wasn't "totally gay" (pause for another groan), but that this didn't make a huge difference to Santana’s point.
- In Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Willow had a committed and long term relationship with Oz and also was in love with Xander. However, during and after her relationship with Tara, she said she was “gay now”.
- Hollyoaks is a repeat offender:
- When Sarah Barnes entered into a relationship with Lydia, despite the number of men she’d been with before, she proclaimed to everyone that she was a lesbian.
- Ste Hay was in a relationship with Amy Barnes for years and they had children together but after he started sleeping with Brendan, he apparently decided to come out as gay.
Photos from the opening night of FIERCE: Photographs of…

Fierce exhibition

Dignity and beauty.

We turn our backs on war.

It's not often that black men are portrayed as being happy.

Compare and contrast
Photos from the opening night of FIERCE: Photographs of under-35’s black LGBT people. Ajamu captured the beauty and dignity of this much-overlooked section of the LGBT and black and minority ethnic communities in this amazing exhibition.
The exhibition takes place at London’s Guildhall. More details HERE
